Sample dataNo contracts are deployed yet. Every book here is replayed through the settler’s own rules, so the arithmetic is real even though the markets are not.
Reading the book…
Reading the book…
recorded for interface parity; the classic rule never reads it
there is none until the market settles and the floors are taken
A book can only absorb so much of the other side. When it runs out, stake is refused and refunded — that is the rule working, not a failure.
Per outcome, as the settler holds it.
| Outcome | Implied | Book P | Vested in V | Capacity C | Headroom H | Room for a stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Above $250 | 40.4% | 4,900.00 | 0.00 | unbounded | unbounded | unbounded |
| Below $250 | 59.5% | 7,200.00 | 0.00 | unbounded | unbounded | unbounded |
Nothing vests here. This market settles under the classic pool rule: the pool is every stake, winning and losing, and each winner takes a share of it in proportion to stake, whenever that stake arrived. There is no accumulator to plot.
The same money, the same books, settled under each rule. The difference is a number, not a claim.
Position #4 on Above $250, with 1,200.00 accepted. Both columns settle the same accepted principal on the same books, so the only thing that differs between them is the rule.
1,200.00
1.00x of stake
Principal, plus everything that vested to it since it entered.
2,963.26
2.46x of stake
Its share of the whole pool, whenever it arrived.
The classic rule would pay 1,763.26 more — 146% of the stake.
The whole pool over this outcome’s principal. Every later stake cuts it.
If this outcome wins
2,963.26USDC
A share of the whole pool in proportion to stake, whenever that stake arrived. Nothing vests here: every stake that enters after you on this outcome takes a share of the same pool, and this number falls.
The boundary is inclusive on the “above” side: a reading exactly at the strike resolves above.
Entries at or after this instant are refused outright. Resolution can only happen from here on, and the accumulator is frozen at it either way, so a slow resolver costs nobody anything.
A reading older than this is not trusted. The market voids and every position refunds at its accepted principal rather than settling on a number nobody should rely on.
12 Sep 2026 12:22 UTC
keccak256 of the whole spec. Registering a different strike or bound produces a different id; it does not edit this one.
Resolution is permissionless: anyone may call the resolver once the freeze has passed, and the caller has no say in the answer and earns nothing for making the call. If the last reading is older than 1m, resolution reverts rather than settling — so a keeper retrying through a brief outage cannot void a good market by accident. Voiding on a stale feed is a separate, deliberate call, and it refunds every position at its accepted principal. Failing that, anyone may void the market from 21 Sep 2026 15:22 UTC.
ClassicParimutuel
what enter and claim take
FeedResolver — permissionless, reads a price feed
chain id 5042002